From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jun 21 22:13:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gbronline.com (mail.gbronline.com [12.145.226.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F041937B409 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from daleco [12.145.236.93] by mail.gbronline.com (SMTPD32-7.10) id A70928590048; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 00:11:37 -0500 Message-ID: <02b801c219ab$6d28fd20$5dec910c@daleco> From: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." To: Subject: ReL Possible security liability: Filling disks with junk or spam Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 00:12:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Darren Pilgrim" > To: "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." > Cc: "Mark Hartley" ; "twig les" ; > > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 11:40 PM > Subject: Re: Possible security liability: Filling disks with junk or spam > > > > "Kevin Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." wrote: > > > > > > Better yet, comment out the lines in /etc/aliases, > > > which will cause the mail to be returned > > > since that user won't exist. > > > > > > Why increase the spam traffic by the use > > > of the bitbucket? If the mail doesn't come > > > back they just keep sending...... > > > > Without the aliases(5) entries, the mail will be delivered > to local mailboxes for those pesudo-users, eventually > filling the disk if you don't monitor disk usage. This was > precisely the problem for Brett's client. < > Doh! Indeed it does.......though I had to reconfig a basically default /etc/aliases to get it to do this... > > >IMO the proper way to handle this is to use an MTA > that has some kind of access-control mechanism to > restrict mail delivery to non-user accounts in addition to > having a forwarding mechanism for them.< > > Seems reasonable. Or just do as /etc/aliases instructed in the first place...why do we only complain when caught in violation of our own policies? KDK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message