Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 17:29:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: Daniel Hagan <dhagan@cs.vt.edu> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: POSIX compliance? Message-ID: <XFMail.990407172944.asmodai@wxs.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.02.9904070904100.30675-100000@vtopus.cs.vt.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07-Apr-99 Daniel Hagan wrote: > Does anyone know what areas of POSIX FreeBSD is not compliant with? This > is apparently an important issue to some of the professors here at Va. > Tech. I am busy categorising the POSIX compliance as well as the Single Unix Specification v2 for FreeBSD on source level basis. Thus far I have done some things on SSv2 already at http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai under the Programmer's Documentation Project link. I also am a member of the Austin group which reviews the POSIX specs for their new version. I hope to do positive work for FreeBSD there (NetBSD, BSDI, and the Linux Standard Base are amongst the other attendees) and I urge other people with at least more longstanding POSIX/FreeBSD hacking to join as well just for the sake of compliancy and pre-information. [ cross-posted to hackers as well for a call to the die hard hackers ;) please do NOT reply to this message without trimming the cc: list please ] --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <http://www.freebsdzine.org>; asmodai(at)wxs.nl The idea does not replace the work... Network/Security Specialist <http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai>; *BSD: Powered by Knowledge & Know-how <http://www.freebsd.org>; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.990407172944.asmodai>