From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jun 29 10:45:10 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from fallkiss.wraith.sf.ca.us (fallkiss.wraith.sf.ca.us [192.58.220.15])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B05037C0B1
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnu@wraith.sf.ca.us)
Received: from wraith.sf.ca.us (night.wraith.sf.ca.us [192.58.220.13])
	by fallkiss.wraith.sf.ca.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA55295
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200006291744.KAA55295@fallkiss.wraith.sf.ca.us>
To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: roots  shell == /bin/sh please
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:44:56 -0700
From: gnu not unix <gnu@wraith.sf.ca.us>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Hi.

My vote is for root's shell to be /bin/sh if anyone's counting.

Is the /bin/sh in freebsd more buggy than, say, the solaris /bin/sh?
If so, thats's probably why it's currently /bin/csh.

I could also live with /bin/bash as root's shell.
Not sure why bash is not part of freebsd "core" anyways.

../Steven


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message