From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 28 6:34:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ip.eth.net (mail.ip.eth.net [202.9.128.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DD837B40A for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 06:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (apparently) from anjali ([61.11.16.239]) by ip.eth.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:04:25 +0530 Message-ID: <008601c14822$3b21bfc0$0a00a8c0@indranet> From: "Anjali Kulkarni" To: Subject: setjmp/longjmp Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 19:03:51 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0083_01C14850.4FF1E140" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0083_01C14850.4FF1E140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi, Does anyone know whether it is advisable or not to use setjmp/longjmp = within kernel code? I could not see any setjmp/longjmp in kernel source = code. Is there a good reason for this or can it be used? Thanks, Anjali ------=_NextPart_000_0083_01C14850.4FF1E140 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hi,

Does anyone know whether it is = advisable or not to=20 use setjmp/longjmp within kernel code? I could not see any = setjmp/longjmp in=20 kernel source code. Is there a good reason for this or can it be=20 used?

Thanks,

Anjali

------=_NextPart_000_0083_01C14850.4FF1E140-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message