From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Nov  6 17:45:20 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA15555
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 17:45:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA15545
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 17:45:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA13551; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 17:45:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611070145.RAA13551@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: still no response 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Nov 1996 17:18:03 PST."
             <328138CB.41C67EA6@whistle.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 17:45:06 -0800
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I think that you will have to check it in and if it doesnt work
just inform people of your time window to fix it 8)

	Regards,
	Amancio

>From The Desk Of Julian Elischer :
> I still haven't heard back from anyone regarding the
> session limit addition in inetd.
> 
> does everyone think it's a boring idea?
> doesn no one dislikr it?
> should I just check it in?
> 
> 
> (patch in previous email)
> 
> julian
>