From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec  1 00:47:28 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233)
	id 84DCD106567F; Thu,  1 Dec 2011 00:47:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 00:47:28 +0000
From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20111201004728.GA53601@freebsd.org>
References: <20111130224422.GA36424@freebsd.org>
	<CADWvR2herXkcMaZXFKm_ALBXnVFDhRCNZ-9+-MwHVx5XJPG4AA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111201000243.GB44877@freebsd.org>
	<CADWvR2irEU0ANHNG4mvC1voVP6Y3YMTQxs5d35o5SbBTJ8JyfQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111201001158.GA48051@freebsd.org>
	<CADWvR2iUB4mDFuwbWzqe6bnjShTZEQzQ-ubAx8h7yqGwjcUHKA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111201003938.GA52503@freebsd.org>
	<CAJ-Vmon4Fn4RAMhHS6skpsy2Lst3XUYXsENSCr0SCQFjQH6c6w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmon4Fn4RAMhHS6skpsy2Lst3XUYXsENSCr0SCQFjQH6c6w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: comparing floating points via "==" or "!="
X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack,
	tools device driver development." <freebsd-wireless.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:47:28 -0000

On Thu Dec  1 11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Erm, these aren't run-time comparisons though, these are done at compile time.
> 
> They can be easily substituted with macro values, or just *100 values.

right. my mistake. i think macro values would be better...simply multiplying
them with 100 would cause collisions, when e.g. 650 mbs rates pop up in the
future.

cheers.
alex

> 
> 
> 
> Adrian