From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 10:56:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F7316A4CE; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:56:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291D443D58; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:56:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBFAuv6t043755; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:56:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Ruslan Ermilov From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:53:27 +0200." <20041215105326.GO25967@ip.net.ua> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:56:57 +0100 Message-ID: <43754.1103108217@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Background fsck is broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:56:59 -0000 In message <20041215105326.GO25967@ip.net.ua>, Ruslan Ermilov writes: >Are you saying it's not possible to downgrade the open to >(r=1, w=0, e=0) when a file system is downgraded from R/W to R/O? Yes: that would make a read-only mounted filesystem vulnerable to overwriting through the /dev entry and we don't want that. The problem is that we do not in the kernel know if we are in single user mode or not. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.