Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 11:43:14 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Steve Lewis <nepolon@systray.com> Cc: "James E. Pace" <jepace@pobox.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Scaling Apache? Message-ID: <20000828114314.Y1209@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10008281146210.22201-100000@greg.ad9.com>; from nepolon@systray.com on Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 11:47:28AM -0700 References: <20000828113233.X1209@fw.wintelcom.net> <Pine.BSF.4.05.10008281146210.22201-100000@greg.ad9.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Steve Lewis <nepolon@systray.com> [000828 11:36] wrote: > On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > For a project I'm working on, I need to have a webserver handle thousands > > > (and 10's of thousands) of simultaneous connections. To do this, it > > > seems the best way is to have lots and LOTS of apache's httpds running > > > at all times. > > > apache is entirely useless for high amounts of traffic, you should be > > investigating another webserver or looking at a clustering/load-balancing > > solution. > > What do you recommend for a web server if Apache is "entirely useless" may > I ask? Zues, thttpd, roxen, there's a lot out there that are a lot faster. Supposedly Zues is king. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000828114314.Y1209>