From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Sep 3 21:41:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA24047 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 21:41:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA24042 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 21:41:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA02808; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 21:40:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Garry Paul Cramins cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP Compliant Kernel? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 04 Sep 1998 06:32:17 +0300." <35EF5F40.66D76833@batelco.com.bh> Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1998 21:40:15 -0700 Message-ID: <2805.904884015@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I am currently running FreeBSD 2.2.6 on my Tyan Dual 120 MHZ system > and am curious as to when the "Stable" release will incorporate SMP. It SMP will never be in -stable. It would represent far too much of an architectural change and is not in keeping with -stable's charter of relatively small, incremental features (evolution rather than revolution). I'm afraid that if SMP is what you want, you're going to have to wait until 3.0 enters it's own -stable phase in Q1 99. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message