From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 18 15:42:22 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4372916A469 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@foster.cc) Received: from QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1056913C4E8 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@foster.cc) Received: from OMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.51]) by QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id SBjl1Y00316AWCU0A0Pl00; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:42:27 +0000 Received: from fosgate.dyndns.org ([71.231.158.147]) by OMTA06.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id SFiS1Y00A3B62Q78S00000; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:42:27 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=uahjgWApxeYA:15 a=htQNZiQuvmIA:10 a=OP5bxEb08/jyN+AGU4sEjQ==:17 a=81ABGVOTAAAA:8 a=LAchUpLqD1GHYQ9TemsA:9 a=JephJkGihO5ox6KZ9h345yz1oS4A:4 a=csDljm-qqwUA:10 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fosgate.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4400439828 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:37:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at foster.cc Received: from fosgate.dyndns.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sonar.foster.dmz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RDBCcwV66HQF for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:37:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.253.48] (unknown [198.134.96.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: mdf) by fosgate.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012733982F for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:37:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4767EA55.6030006@foster.cc> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:42:13 -0800 From: "Mark D. Foster" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20071217063559.GB33846@demeter.hydra> <20071218050403.GA41080@demeter.hydra> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: common filesystem for Linux and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 15:42:22 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > ext2fs is "stable" in the sense that there are no known bugs, and it's > 100% compatible with Linux. It "just works". > > Unless you get frequent power outages or similar "hard" errors, the lack > of journaling shouldn't bother you much. I suggest that ext2+noatime is going to give him much better performance vs. ext3 anyway. -- Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.' Mark D. Foster, CISSP http://mark.foster.cc/