Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:42:13 -0800 From: "Mark D. Foster" <mark@foster.cc> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: common filesystem for Linux and FreeBSD Message-ID: <4767EA55.6030006@foster.cc> In-Reply-To: <fk863c$to3$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20071217063559.GB33846@demeter.hydra> <fk5g4r$682$1@ger.gmane.org> <20071218050403.GA41080@demeter.hydra> <fk863c$to3$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Voras wrote: > ext2fs is "stable" in the sense that there are no known bugs, and it's > 100% compatible with Linux. It "just works". > > Unless you get frequent power outages or similar "hard" errors, the lack > of journaling shouldn't bother you much. I suggest that ext2+noatime is going to give him much better performance vs. ext3 anyway. -- Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.' Mark D. Foster, CISSP <mark@foster.cc> http://mark.foster.cc/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4767EA55.6030006>