From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 13 07:05:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 5CFD616A473; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 07:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 07:05:12 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Xin LI Message-ID: <20060613070512.GA24217@FreeBSD.org> References: <200606091901.k59J1FP6008771@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200606091901.k59J1FP6008771@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/ftp/pure-ftpd Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 07:05:12 -0000 On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 07:01:15PM +0000, Xin LI wrote: > delphij 2006-06-09 19:01:15 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > ftp/pure-ftpd Makefile > Log: > Add an new option to provide a mechanism for users to disable kqueue > support if necessary. What are possible cases of when disabling kqueue is for good? ./danfe