From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Thu Jul 23 20:48:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1544D9A9EF0 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C061BF0; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:48:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZINPP-0003mR-KZ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:48:03 +0300 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:48:03 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: d@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Security Advisories Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-15:13.tcp Message-ID: <20150723204803.GE43740@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20150722025746.721831C32@freefall.freebsd.org> <20150722131856.GD43740@zxy.spb.ru> <55B140B5.8050904@delphij.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55B140B5.8050904@delphij.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:48:14 -0000 On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:29:57PM -0700, Xin Li wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 07/22/15 06:18, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 02:57:46AM +0000, FreeBSD Security > > Advisories wrote: > > > > This is correspondent to kern/25986? Or kern/25986 is different > > bug? > > I think it's the same bug. I see patch in kern/25986 is different from SA. May be SA close not all issuses?