From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Feb 15 5:49:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from server1.huntsvilleal.com (www.huntsvilleal.com [207.13.224.7]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541DD4220 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 05:49:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from barricuda.bsd.nws.net (kris.huntsvilleal.com [207.13.224.46]) by server1.huntsvilleal.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA09499; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 08:33:28 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by barricuda.bsd.nws.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA18885; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 07:49:43 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kris@hiwaay.net) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 07:49:43 -0600 (CST) From: Kris Kirby To: Juergen Nickelsen Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Windows 2000 isn't that smart, but everything else is In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I saw this a lot from a FreeBSD box (3.4-RELEASE) that was connected > to the same Ethernet segment with two NICs (in different logical > networks). It really got on my nerves, and Windows 2000 was not > involved. The difference with this example is that the Win2K box was *not* attached to just one segment. Two NICs, two LANs. Not both on one LAN. ---- Kris Kirby, KE4AHR | TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. | ------------------------------------------------------- "God gave them the ability to reproduce... ... Science gave us the hope they won't." -KBK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message