From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed May 30 13:48: 9 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from dragon.ender.com (dragon.ender.com [216.65.103.147])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E9937B42C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dive@dragon.ender.com)
Received: (from dive@localhost)
	by dragon.ender.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA24513
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:48:00 -0700
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:48:00 -0700
From: dive <dive@ender.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Should IPFilter be pulled from FreeBSD as well
Message-ID: <20010530134800.A24208@dragon.ender.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-stable.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-stable>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-stable>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I'm in favor of keeping ipf in the base system, since the base system is (understandably)
watched a lot more closely for bugs and generally things tend to get fixed in the base
more quickly (such as the recent fragmentation issue in ipfilter)
I use ipfilter / ipnat in favor of ipfw/natd, since ipnat greatly outperforms natd in my
setup.
-Sean


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message