Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:27:09 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Alex Samorukov <ml@os2.kiev.ua> Cc: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk devices speed is ugly Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmok9Ph1sgFCy6kNT4XR14grTLvG9M3JvT9eVBRjgqD%2BY9g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F37F81E.7070100@os2.kiev.ua> References: <4F215A99.8020003@os2.kiev.ua> <4F27C04F.7020400@omnilan.de> <4F27C7C7.3060807@os2.kiev.ua> <CAJ-VmomezUWrEgxxmUEOhWnmLDohMAWRpSXmTR=n2y_LuizKJg@mail.gmail.com> <4F37F81E.7070100@os2.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 February 2012 09:34, Alex Samorukov <ml@os2.kiev.ua> wrote: > Yes. But it will nit fix non-cached access to the disk (raw) devices. And > this is the main reason why ntfs-3g and exfat are much slower then working > on Linux. But _that_ can be fixed with the appropriate application of a sensible caching layer. So if there are alignment issues, let's fix those up first so filesystems act sensibly with the block device layer. Then yes, adding a caching layer that works. I didn't get very good performance with g_cache when i last tried it. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmok9Ph1sgFCy6kNT4XR14grTLvG9M3JvT9eVBRjgqD%2BY9g>