From owner-freebsd-security Sat Apr 1 11:29:59 1995 Return-Path: security-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA26078 for security-outgoing; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 11:29:59 -0800 Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA26072 for ; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 11:29:56 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA15637; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 11:28:49 -0800 Message-Id: <199504011928.LAA15637@precipice.shockwave.com> To: Bruce Evans cc: security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: root owning everything In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Apr 1995 05:15:53 +1000." <199504011915.FAA18492@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 1995 11:28:49 -0800 From: Paul Traina Sender: security-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk From: Bruce Evans Subject: Re: root owning everything >Except for setuid files, the majority of files in / and /usr should be owned >by root, not bin, so that I can't nfsmount a volume read-write and su to >bin and have a party. >An alternative would be to map uid bin to nobody the same way root is done. I don't like files owned by root. They force me to run as root too much. The CSRG Makefiles seem to have the same policy as we have (almost everything owned by bin). How is this problem traditionally handled? Bruce read only mounts and a lot of praying