From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sun Feb 9 04:13:32 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A1822CF34; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 04:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FbHw065fz4fRD; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 04:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j0dyL-00025V-Ep; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:13:29 -0700 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1j0dyK-0005qh-Q3; Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:13:29 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6293116179E; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 21:13:28 -0700 (MST) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id a5sgC9bHANs5; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 21:13:28 -0700 (MST) Received: from photon.int.bluestop.org (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1948F1614CD; Sat, 8 Feb 2020 21:13:28 -0700 (MST) To: araujo@freebsd.org Cc: Dima Panov , Rebecca Cran , svn-ports-all , svn-ports-head , ports-committers References: <202002070444.0174iOaP083542@repo.freebsd.org> <98b1bcb9-f2f4-432b-abd3-4885b1cb9de6@Canary> <492bb276-06fa-6e4c-2a33-a026448851de@bsdio.com> From: Rebecca Cran Message-ID: <76277cf5-9799-9327-9266-b71dee7da421@bsdio.com> Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2020 21:13:27 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-XM-SPF: eid=1j0dyK-0005qh-Q3; ; ; mid=<76277cf5-9799-9327-9266-b71dee7da421@bsdio.com>; ; ; hst=in01.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.67; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa02.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,HTML_MESSAGE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,XMGappySubj_01, XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5004] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.5 XMGappySubj_01 Very gappy subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;araujo@freebsd.org X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 411 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.1 (0.8%), b_tie_ro: 2.2 (0.5%), parse: 1.46 (0.4%), extract_message_metadata: 9 (2.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.08 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.1 (0.5%), tests_pri_-950: 1.11 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 0.88 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 19 (4.5%), check_bayes: 17 (4.2%), b_tokenize: 6 (1.5%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.4%), b_comp_prob: 1.47 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.3 (0.6%), b_finish: 0.62 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 363 (88.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.45 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 108 (26.2%), poll_dns_idle: 102 (24.8%), tests_pri_10: 2.6 (0.6%), tests_pri_500: 6 (1.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: svn commit: r525460 - in head: . sysutils sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve-devel sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve/files X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48FbHw065fz4fRD X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.989,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2020 04:13:32 -0000 On 2020-02-08 20:25, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > > One suggestion for now to still keep supporting CSM till you figure > out how to fix it on EDK would be, make the CSM port based on the old > EDK version that still supports it and proceed with the updates as you > did before and were good. > > IMHO, CSM will die sooner or later as more and more OS are supporting > UEFI. > > Of course the easiest way to solve this issue is, fix the CSM support > on the latest version of EDK. I'll wait until I get the CSM working with the latest version of the EDK2 before updating the main port again. I don't know if Bhyve supports it, but perhaps the best solution for people wanting to run OSes which aren't UEFI-aware is to use misc/seabios . Also, given how people always want to play with older OSes like Windows 98/2000, I'm not sure we'll ever want to do away with legacy/CSM/etc. support! -- Rebecca Cran