From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Thu Dec 31 15:34:48 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865D5A5767B
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:34:48 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76A66178B
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:34:48 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tBVFYgjF081360
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:34:48 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 128030] [ipsec] Enable IPSec in GENERIC kernel configuration
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:34:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: conf
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: feld@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gnn@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-128030-2472-7wmI7x1sGm@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-128030-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-128030-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:34:48 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D128030

--- Comment #17 from Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Nick B from comment #16)

I suspect we won't see it MFC to 10.x unless the performance impact is deem=
ed
acceptable. It's supposedly minor, but the further improvements to make IPS=
EC
have a negligible penalty likely cannot be MFC'd to 10.x.

gnn should have more details as he was involved in the actual analysis of t=
he
impact.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=