From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 11 09:30:02 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA05983 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 09:30:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA05951 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 09:29:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA21487; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 10:32:31 -0700 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 10:32:31 -0700 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199601111732.KAA21487@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: "Garrett A. Wollman" Cc: James Raynard , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arrrgh, this was working Sunday... In-Reply-To: <9601111707.AA17486@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> References: <9601040106.AA00652@tera.com> <9601111707.AA17486@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > Also, to get a better background on what's going on, do 'man 5 resolver' > > (unfortunately, this gets off to a rather confusing start by assuming that > > "a normally configured system" runs a nameserver). > > A normally configured system /does/ run a nameserver, if only to cache > the results of previous queries. Hogwash. On my local network, is simply wasting memory and more maintenance to run a namserver on all the machines Nate