From owner-freebsd-current Sun Apr 23 12:30:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87B737BAF3; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 12:30:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA63599; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 12:30:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 12:30:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200004231930.MAA63599@apollo.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday References: <45851.956517875@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :In message <200004231922.MAA63538@apollo.backplane.com>, Matthew Dillon writes: : :> Core should consider reverting the special rules that were originally :> created with the expectation of major breakage in 5.x back to :> the set of rules we had for 3.x and 4.x. : :I have no idea what special rules you are talking about for 4.x/5.x. : :4.x-stable is a -stable tree and shall be treated as such. Really, then you have a short memory. Why don't we ask Jordan for a clarification. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message