From owner-freebsd-security Mon Sep 25 1:57: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C6437B422 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 01:56:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA52097; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 10:55:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: andrew@scoop.co.nz Cc: mipam@ibb.net, "Vladimir Mencl, MK, susSED" , Ali Alaoui El Hassani <961BE653994@stud.alakhawayn.ma>, CrazZzy Slash , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: Encryption over IP References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 25 Sep 2000 10:55:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: Andrew McNaughton's message of "Mon, 25 Sep 2000 20:30:18 +1200 (NZST)" Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Andrew McNaughton writes: > This is true, but does not contradict what you replied to. The problems > relate to duplication of error correction, and do not break the > connection, but do have performance implications. > > I guess we all agree with each other? Yes. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message