From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 04:03:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72459A30E9 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 04:03:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: from outbound3.ore.mailhop.org (erouter6.ore.mailhop.org [54.187.213.119]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98CFF1DBD for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 04:03:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: from ilsoft.org (unknown [73.34.117.227]) by outbound3.ore.mailhop.org (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 04:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rev (rev [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t6G43Y1M053079; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 22:03:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <1437019414.1334.355.camel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ubldr vs ubldr.bin? From: Ian Lepore To: Tim Kientzle Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 22:03:34 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <1436978285.1334.335.camel@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 04:03:42 -0000 On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 20:15 -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Ian Lepore wrote: > > > > ubldr.bin is a raw executable image > > (no elf headers) which is self-relocating and can be loaded at any > > address. … a common armv6[hf] userland that runs > > on any board. Previously the single userland difference between various > > arm boards is that UBLDR_LOADADDR was different for each board. > > Wonderful! Nice work. > > > > … and ubldr is still > > being built only for compatibility with people that have older u-boot > > installed. > > Hmmm…. I wonder how Crochet should handle this. Plenty of folks use Crochet to build 10-STABLE and 10.1 images, so we have to be a little careful about jumping ahead with new features that are only available in 11-CURRENT. > > Any plans to MFC this? > > Tim It has all been MFC'd to 10-stable around the end of May and will be in 10.2. The only missing piece is changes to the u-boot ports. I got started on that, got like just wandboard done (but not comitted, I'm not actually a ports committer so I have to get someone's approval to commit), then this crazy-deadline project came up at work. -- Ian