From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 10 11:09:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03611106564A for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bschmidt@techwires.net) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D378FC14 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:09:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so1335043fxm.13 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 03:09:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.101.140 with SMTP id c12mr12891638fao.16.1297336165179; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 03:09:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from jessie.localnet (p5B2ECC3D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.46.204.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a6sm978876fak.1.2011.02.10.03.09.22 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 Feb 2011 03:09:22 -0800 (PST) Sender: Bernhard Schmidt From: Bernhard Schmidt To: Monthadar Al Jaberi Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:09:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-28-generic; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; ) References: <201102101119.07350.bschmidt@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102101209.19983.bschmidt@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 80211s HWMP problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bschmidt@freebsd.org List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:09:27 -0000 On Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:42:05 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: > Okej, I run all four scenarios: > > 0->2 OK, but the first "ping -c 1" got lost > 1->3 OK, > 2->0 OK, > 3->1 FAIL, works after "ping -c 1" 1->2 > > looks like path is built correct in one way only? :S I have no clue about the mesh code.. but, that smells like there are a few frames discard which are supposed to fill the ARP table. Can I talk you into dumping frames on the interfaces to figure out where those discards happen? > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > On Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:06:41 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: > >> Hej, wanna check if anyone encountered this problem: > >> I setup 4 mesh nodes in a link topology ( 0 <-> 1 <-> 2 <-> 3) > >> > >> But I cant ping from 3 to 0, or 0 to 3, without first ping between > >> the nodes to fill the hwmp route tables. > > > > Pinging 0 -> 2, 1 -> 3, 2 -> 0 and 3 -> 1 on freshly started nodes > > works though? > > > > -- > > Bernhard -- Bernhard