From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Aug 10 10:23:13 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA00965 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 10:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hwcn.org (main.hwcn.org [199.212.94.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA00955 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 10:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hwcn.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA01600; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 13:23:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA18103; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 13:23:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca: ac199 owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 13:23:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: ac199@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca Reply-To: hoek@hwcn.org To: Brandon Gillespie cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why bother submitting anything (via send-pr) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 10 Aug 1997, Brandon Gillespie wrote: > I'm debating with myself why I should bother submitting anything with > send-pr anymore. It seems that unless it happens to be a pet project of > one of the developers, it will pretty much be ignored and never committed. It might help to Cc the original pr to the person who (should) be responsible. Any reason for a follow-up can also remind someone of the pr, too. :-) -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk