From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri Dec 27 15:20: 9 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7B737B401
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:20:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877D643ED4
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:20:08 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBRNK8NS081986
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:20:08 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gBRNK7VV081985;
	Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:20:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:20:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200212272320.gBRNK7VV081985@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Manuel Kasper <mk@neon1.net>
Subject: Re: kern/46564: IPFilter and IPFW processing order is not sensible
Reply-To: Manuel Kasper <mk@neon1.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR kern/46564; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Manuel Kasper <mk@neon1.net>
To: <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>, <mk@neon1.net>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: kern/46564: IPFilter and IPFW processing order is not sensible
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 00:13:03 +0100

 SORRY, I confused the ordering - the description is wrong! Actually, at the
 moment, ipfilter is always checked BEFORE ipfw for both incoming and
 outgoing packets, so the order really is:
 
 incoming:
 -> ipnat -> ipfilter -> ipfw
 
 outgoing:
 -> ipfilter -> ipnat -> ipfw
 
 The problem is still the same (outgoing packets are seen with a public
 source IP address, incoming packets will have a private/internal destination
 address when used with ipnat), and the fix is correct.
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message