From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jun 6 6: 0: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A1337C014 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 06:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id GAA21909; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 06:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 06:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200006061300.GAA21909@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "KATO Tsuguru" Subject: Re: ports/19035: Update databases/db to build shared lib Reply-To: "KATO Tsuguru" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/19035; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "KATO Tsuguru" To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: lioux@uol.com.br Subject: Re: ports/19035: Update databases/db to build shared lib Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 21:53:03 +0900 According to Porter's Handbook, initial version number of shared lib must be 1, not 0. Additional linker flags except '--soname' are alse unneeded in ordinaly case. In adding that, I suppose separating version number part from full shared lib name would be useful for future upgrading, as such: --- SOVER= 1 ... libfoo.so.$(SOVER): --- Of course this shouldn't be necessaly, however. -- KATO Tsuguru / tkato@prontomail.ne.jp Sent by Japanese ProntoMail To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message