From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 20:43:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0A616A4D0 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:43:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from vette.gigo.com (vette.gigo.com [216.218.228.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA8443FCB for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:43:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lioux@brturbo.com) Received: from 200.101.111.208 (200-101-111-208.bsace705.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [200.101.111.208]) by vette.gigo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40E65709 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:39:31 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 31158 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Nov 2003 04:14:39 -0000 Message-ID: <20031111041439.31157.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> Received: (qmail 3237 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 06:47:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 06:47:11 -0000 Received: from pop3.uol.com.br by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.4) for lioux-freebsd@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 09 Oct 2003 03:47:11 -0259 (BRT) Received: from peart.uol.com.br (172.26.5.199) by mtauol7.mail.sys.intranet (5.1.071) id 3EDB5C0C019AB962 for lioux-freebsd@uol.com.br; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 03:39:35 -0300 Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by storm15.uol.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4579A143A6 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 03:40:07 -0300 (BRT) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5447D55F38 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:39:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-src-committers@FreeBSD.org) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6B73916A4E9; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:39:27 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: lioux@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538) id 2627416A4C0; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: src-committers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C7116A4B3; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:38:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F2643FBF; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:38:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mail by mx.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A7UUE-0006Mt-00; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 13:41:22 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A7UUB-0006Jk-00; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 13:41:19 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h996d02R062578; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:39:01 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h996d0Tx062553; Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:39:00 +0700 (NOVST) From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Sam Leffler References: <200310082352.h98Nq0ws011528@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310082352.h98Nq0ws011528@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Envelope-To: sam@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Sender: owner-src-committers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/hifn hifn7751.c hifn7751reg.h hifn7751var.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 04:43:45 -0000 X-Original-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:39:00 +0700 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 04:43:45 -0000 On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:52:00PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: > sam 2003/10/08 16:52:00 PDT > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > sys/dev/hifn hifn7751.c hifn7751reg.h hifn7751var.h > Log: > MFC 7955/7956 symmetric crypto support Hmm, had this stuff been extensively tested to be insta-MFCed, especially considering we're so close to 4.9-RELEASE and, just as you said, it's performance being currently suboptimal? I've always been under impression that -STABLE should probably stay out of such treatments. ./danfe