From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar  6 08:39:23 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BC5CD16A4CE; Sun,  6 Mar 2005 08:39:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from deliver.smtp.vlink.ru (alias.rigel.internal.vlink.ru
	[217.23.88.17])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4CFFF43D1F; Sun,  6 Mar 2005 08:39:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dsh@vlink.ru)
Received: from smtp.smtp.vlink.ru (clamav.smtp.vlink.ru [192.168.4.1])
	by deliver.smtp.vlink.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C45D456B2;
	Sun,  6 Mar 2005 11:39:22 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from neva.vlink.ru (neva.vlink.ru [217.107.252.29])
	by smtp.smtp.vlink.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216C34536F;
	Sun,  6 Mar 2005 11:39:22 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from neva.vlink.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by neva.vlink.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j268dL7c028905;
	Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:39:21 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from dsh@vlink.ru)
Received: (from dsh@localhost)
	by neva.vlink.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j268dLeC028902;
	Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:39:21 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from dsh@vlink.ru)
X-Comment-To: Mathieu Arnold
To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc>
References: <87is46kzk1.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
	<41C26F23F7DF023CB3DF35C5@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
	<87sm3ajj8s.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
	<20050305151903.GC26240@hub.freebsd.org>
	<87mzth18e2.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
	<1DE178D508C1D70D1B5F9E87@cc-171.int.t-online.fr>
From: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@vneva.link.ru.vlink.ru>
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:39:21 +0300
In-Reply-To: <1DE178D508C1D70D1B5F9E87@cc-171.int.t-online.fr> (Mathieu
 Arnold's message of "Sun, 06 Mar 2005 09:36:57 +0100")
Message-ID: <87k6oluq12.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp,
 berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:45:48 +0000
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: unionfs 5.4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 08:39:23 -0000

>>>>> "Mathieu" == Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> writes:

 Mathieu> Well, nullfs and unionfs have the same BUGS section :-)
 Mathieu> OTOH, nullfs has never panic'ed me, whereas unionfs has.

Possible, but I can't use it for jail's system because it very slow.

-- 
DSS5-RIPE DSS-RIPN 2:550/5068@fidonet 2:550/5069@fidonet
mailto:dsh@vlink.ru http://neva.vlink.ru/~dsh/