From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Nov 9 18:29:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.hiwaay.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DF337B4C5; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 18:29:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from bonsai.knology.net (user-24-214-88-8.knology.net [24.214.88.8]) by mail.hiwaay.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eAA2TP710661; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 20:29:25 -0600 (CST) Received: (from steve@localhost) by bonsai.knology.net (8.11.0/8.9.3) id eAA2TOt02437; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 20:29:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from steve) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 20:29:18 -0600 From: Steve Price To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Cc: Jordan Hubbard , Jimmy , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, pine@freebsd.ady.ro, kris@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.2 BETA ISO image Message-ID: <20001109202918.S62344@bonsai.knology.net> References: <21255.973810192@winston.osd.bsdi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:05:31PM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:05:31PM -0800, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: # * From: Jordan Hubbard # # * Argh. People keep making ports interactive for "security" reasons # * but then forget that interactive packages are not handled by sysinstall # * and should be marked IS_INTERACTIVE so that I can keep them off the CD. # * # * I'll remove the pine port from the final CD image, but this goes for any # * other ports which do the same thing. :-( # # Ports marked IS_INTERACTIVE won't be packaged at all for obvious # reasons -- I won't be able to hit return for packages built from # cron. :) Actually I believe he is talking about ports that are interactive on install (not build). Most (if not all) of these have been fixed to not require interaction during package builds (nay installs) ... # Perhaps sysinstall should be fixed? If that is not possible, we can # introduce a new fixed comment that you can grep for or something. ... which is why I suggested to Jordan (in a private mail apparently because I haven't seen it come through) that a *very* hackish solution of handling ports like pine4 would be to add the following lines to the appropriate spot in sysinstall. setenv("PACKAGE_BUILDING", "t", 1); setenv("BATCH", "t", 1); -steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message