From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 24 02:38:47 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E44C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 24 Aug 2004 02:38:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A5343D48
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 24 Aug 2004 02:38:47 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from parv@chvlva.adelphia.net)
Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.71.53])
	by mta13.adelphia.netESMTP
	<20040824023846.VNFS24693.mta13.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>;
	Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:38:46 -0400
Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 47E2B574E; Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:40:32 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:40:32 -0400
From: Parv <parv@pair.com>
To: horio shoichi <bugsgrief@bugsgrief.net>
Message-ID: <20040824024032.GA3298@moo.holy.cow>
Mail-Followup-To: horio shoichi <bugsgrief@bugsgrief.net>,
	freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <20040822035742.GA13803@thai-aec.org>
	<200408231014.25298.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
	<20040822035742.GA13803@thai-aec.org>
	<20040822152625.GA32816@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20040823025952.GA14519@thai-aec.org>
	<20040823.231846.7ede85c647d0486f.10.0.3.20@bugsgrief.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040823.231846.7ede85c647d0486f.10.0.3.20@bugsgrief.net>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: make package-recursive
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: f-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 02:38:47 -0000

in message
<20040823.231846.7ede85c647d0486f.10.0.3.20@bugsgrief.net>, wrote
horio shoichi thusly...
>
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 09:59:52 +0700 "User &"
> <pirat@access.inet.co.th> wrote:
>
> > there should some way to tell make that if ports have been made
> > package, the next time that ports should not have been made
> > again in the make package-recursive from some other ports.

Concur.


> Unfortunately, no. Change CFLAGS and remake, change some of make
> options and remake, ... They give (for the most part) single same
> package name.

So, package-recursive is useful, rather not wasteful, only if a port
depends on previously un-packaged ports.


> This problem (no straightforward way to indicate what exactly the
> outcome is) is inherent even in compilations (or file naming
> conventions we have).  Since make package has undergone build
> process, and doesn't know if it is being repackaged with the same
> set of files, it probably took the safest path, which is the right
> thing, I guess.

How about use of digest checksum(s) stored in a port's file to
compare w/ that of port's package before start of package-ing?

If package name is different or the checksums don't match (say,
different options, CFLAGS & such), package should be built.


  - Parv

--