Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 13:04:49 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patches rules (Was: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/qpopper Makefile ports/mail/qpopper/patchespatch-manpages ports/mail/qpopper/pkg MESSAGE PLISTports/mail/qpopper/scripts pre-install) Message-ID: <20000719130449.A39796@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0007190627310.26775-100000@blues.jpj.net>; from trevor@jpj.net on Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 06:46:41AM -0400 References: <20000719122538.E36043@cichlids.cichlids.com> <Pine.BSI.4.21.0007190627310.26775-100000@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Trevor Johnson (trevor@jpj.net): > reason for the scheme. Then it goes on to say "you should avoid having > more than one patch fix the same file" which AFAICT is the only time the > sequence would matter. Patches should not depend on each other anyways :) Alex -- cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000719130449.A39796>