From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 27 12:30:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34380106568D for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:30:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rbgarga@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3E38FC1E for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:30:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so1190766ewy.3 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:30:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=W2QuEwxkeN9bn+IIhMDOYI7mf9WWMbBpIs32gk/sGNs=; b=clim6phA7w75p4ccMLQb/EkzXC+X4OY7x+iGt33I0RvUItEIcFw913PshGjlqlQmJB rjZwFTPZT2q2bm8q1MqvWsEr/eoP36lRRjxriuGsyXpVctkXxYvw/UQhNLcfRhxdiU8S 5IoO1/Nx8K+03eAo6P3vyygqbuWzWWFDn+rgU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=pP7EzLG4TU6gTvP/bP22UrQXy39CxBUHhlcZyMzHjj2y5gA0jbfmwMUhnw32i08Lj4 AzxMS9vZWycBhmTFq0FzotwnxQvRZ2hP27n7TReTm/1x/WUy78XvmZha4e1IYrzJ6L/d dg7wQNNuYB4ON5aRYGUTM0IK84U0l4jugP5uc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.171.207 with SMTP id r57mr813939wel.146.1264593962063; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:06:02 -0800 (PST) From: Renato Botelho Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:05:42 -0200 Message-ID: <747dc8f31001270405l4fc1e79ctb892ad92db96204d@mail.gmail.com> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: problems building new clamav because of march i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:30:35 -0000 I'm having some problem trying to update clamav-devel port to a new snapshot. Since it's using llvm now, i didn't build on i386 arch, after some changes, it builds now but without atomic build. The point is, the clamav team say since our march is i386-* the binaries are built for old i386 arch, is it correct? Here is the thread under clamav-devel maillist, could someone take a look and gimme some help to understand and maybe fix the problem? http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20091222.104012.8c8e6750.en.html -- Renato Botelho