From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 20 04:19:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA0A106566C; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 04:19:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from EXHUB015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478518FC12; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 04:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (71.191.169.185) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 21:19:09 -0700 Message-ID: <4D85803E.2060902@p6m7g8.com> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:19:10 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitan Adler References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports , x11@freebsd.org, miwi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Ports Infrastructure Changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 04:19:09 -0000 On 3/19/2011 8:48 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: >> www-clients - browsers, rss clients, wget-alike, webapi/soap clients, >> benchmarks >> www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache >> www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries >> www (rest, not moved) - html editors, authoring tools, search engines .. > > IMHO html editors should go into the editors/ category. > > While we are on the subject of moving things around I'd like to see > x11/ split out into their appropriate categories. Things like > x11/xeyes should go into games/ and x11/xscreensaver into security/ > > The general x11/ category could be used for infrastructure and servers > (the libs and the current -servers category) > > I tend to agree with Eitan here. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.