From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 06:02:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DF5106564A for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C377D8FC1B for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:02:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8hTv1b0010QuhwU53u2JKl; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:02:18 +0000 Received: from daland.home ([24.34.211.11]) by OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 8u2H1b0040FJTGg3Nu2Ha6; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:02:18 +0000 Received: from algo by daland.home with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LS3VA-000G5o-5B; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:02:16 -0500 From: Alex Goncharov To: Kent In-reply-to: <200901272138.48001.kstewart@owt.com> (message from Kent on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:38:47 -0800) References: <83e5fb980901271450l5cfed446n9f6d61c72a618ea@mail.gmail.com> <200901272138.48001.kstewart@owt.com> Message-Id: Sender: Alex Goncharov Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:02:16 -0500 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, trebestie@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, alex-goncharov@comcast.net Subject: Re: Unhappy Xorg upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alex Goncharov List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:02:18 -0000 ,--- You/Kent (Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:38:47 -0800) ----* | I had 3 system with this problem and they started to work after I added | (Options "AutoAddDevices" "off") to the ServerLayout section. I did have the `Options "AutoAddDevices" "false"' piece, and the two other required "disregard HAL" options in the ServerFlags section (I guess you meant "Flags", not "Layout", too). While this enabled the mouse (without HAL), it did nothing good about: a. The bogus keyboard scans. b. The garbage in the windows. You can't imagine how much better the old X11 looks, after that excursion into the new one :-) Thanks, -- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net --