From owner-freebsd-security  Fri Nov  8 12:48:23 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA07456
          for security-outgoing; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 12:48:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu (postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu [128.174.5.11])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA07446
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 12:48:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (alecto.physics.uiuc.edu [128.174.83.167]) by postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id OAA95844; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 14:48:14 -0600
Received: by alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
	 id OAA10009; Fri, 8 Nov 1996 14:47:54 -0600
From: igor@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu (Igor Roshchin)
Message-Id: <199611082047.OAA10009@alecto.physics.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Re: NFS Server, is it secure?
To: froden@bigblue.no
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 14:47:54 -0600 (CST)
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199611081903.UAA13125@login.bigblue.no> from "Frode Nordahl" at Nov 8, 96 08:02:02 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Starting up an NFS server on a FreeBSD 2.1.5 box, is it secure, given that the configuration is correct?  Are there any known 
> holes other than faulty configuration?
> 
> 

Can anybody show an example how an incorrect configuration
of named can decrease security ?