From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 20 14:17:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: multimedia@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E031416A412 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:17:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED7043D70 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:17:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 13628 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2006 00:17:32 +1000 Received: from 203-217-44-23.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.217.44.23) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 21 Sep 2006 00:17:32 +1000 Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 00:17:29 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: casey@thelinuxdiaries.com Message-ID: <20060921001729.75703476@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1158477972.87695.4.camel@localhost> References: <1158477972.87695.4.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: deskutils/xchm failed build X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:17:34 -0000 On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 07:26:12 +0000 Casey Strouse wrote: > I attempted to install xchm from ports today on my FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE > system and the build failed, asking me to report the error and attach > several files. Attached you will find the files it asked me to include. did it suggest you report to multimedia@ ? you should use ports@, or even better, send a PR, or contact the mantainer directly ( check the Makefile for the mantainer). B _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea." RFC 1925 (quoting an unnamed source) I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.