Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:56:11 +0300 From: Pavel Bychykhin <pavel.priv@hte.vl.net.ua> To: =?UTF-8?B?RWR3YXJkIFRvbWFzeiBOYXBpZXJhxYJh?= <trasz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some of ZFS ACLs doesn't work as expected Message-ID: <503128BB.6040801@hte.vl.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <06453437-D034-41C2-8B7F-15B228AD2532@FreeBSD.org> References: <502FD583.9070105@hte.vl.net.ua> <06453437-D034-41C2-8B7F-15B228AD2532@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
19.08.2012 19:40, Edward Tomasz Napierała пишет: > Wiadomość napisana przez Pavel Bychykhin w dniu 18 sie 2012, o godz. 19:48: >> Dear community! >> >> After my experiments with ZFS, I concluded, that permissions "delete_child" and "delete" are ignored. >> For the create/update/delete operation a list of "rwxp" (read_data/write_data/execute/append_data) is fully sufficient. > > They are not ignored, but yes, write access on a directory is enough to delete a file. > >> No need to specify the "delete_child" and "delete" permissions at all, or I don't understand something? > > Unless you need them - no, you don't. That's why these bits are not set in a default > case (so called 'trivial ACL', i.e. no ACL set on a file). > Could you please provide an example of at least one practical situation, where the "delete_child" and "delete" permissions would be useful? -- Best regards, Pavel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?503128BB.6040801>