From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 27 03:43:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA14673 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 03:43:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dt053nb4.san.rr.com (dt053nb4.san.rr.com [204.210.34.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA14624 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 03:43:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Received: from dal.net (Studded@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dt053nb4.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA01559; Sun, 27 Sep 1998 03:42:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Studded@dal.net) Message-ID: <360E167F.7327B4BA@dal.net> Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 03:42:07 -0700 From: Studded Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE-0920 i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Lewis CC: Peter Wemm , Ollivier Robert , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Softupdates panics References: <199809270905.CAA01883@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Don Lewis wrote: > That makes more sense. It doesn't seem to make sense to use both softupdates > and async. Last I recall the softupdates folks were going to make it impossible to do both precisely because it was bad. My understanding was that this change was already made, but I could be wrong. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message