From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 8 00:29:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0819416A420; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 00:29:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928DB43D45; Wed, 8 Mar 2006 00:29:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k280TIx6069590; Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:29:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k280THQu057011 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:29:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.0.20060307192543.0531ae40@64.7.153.2> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:29:16 -0500 To: John Baldwin , stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: <200603071502.46074.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200603071502.46074.jhb@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 64.7.153.18 Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] MFC of the intr_event stuff X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:29:20 -0000 At 03:02 PM 07/03/2006, John Baldwin wrote: >I have a somewhat large patch that MFC's some of the cleanups to the >interrupt code that needs some testing before it is MFC'd. It seems to help my sio overflows that are described in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=51982 I have it applied to a number of different chipsets and am testing with a couple of different PCI modems. post patch dmesgs can be found at http://www.tancsa.com/irq-mfc/ including an dual core X2, ICH6 and a via mini-itx with 4 com ports built in. Apart from doing "sio" stuff, any particular way to stress the devices ? ---Mike