From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 29 07:50:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F0416A4CE for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 07:50:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A902143D41 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 07:50:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-gnome@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Aazev-0007X9-00 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:50:21 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AayvD-0006xP-00 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:03:07 +0100 Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AayvD-0004Ii-00 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:03:07 +0100 From: "Scott I. Remick" Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:03:07 -0500 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <20031228032922.70d73f33.samy@kerneled.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) X-Archive: encrypt Sender: news Subject: Re: New GNOME splash screen X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:50:23 -0000 On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 03:29:22 +0300, Samy Al Bahra wrote: > I am curious to hear your opinions on > http://samy.kerneled.com/gnome-splash.png > > If enough of you like it, then it will replace the current splash screen > next gnome-session update. Enjoy. I like the current one better. This proposed one is a bit too "cartoony" for me. I prefer a polished, professional look, one that suggests technical quality, vs "hipness". Not sure if this helps.