Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:44:40 -0400
From:      George Neville-Neil <gnn@neville-neil.com>
To:        Kevin Lo <kevlo@kevlo.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: FUSE kernel module for the kernel...
Message-ID:  <0C9EC90B-8846-4C19-A744-F1ABEFB180D6@neville-neil.com>
In-Reply-To: <1331452568.2105.7.camel@nsl>
References:  <C55C880E-8DA3-42A8-9837-32D4B02FD742@FreeBSD.org> <op.waw2cftc34t2sn@tech304> <0826905E-32FE-4F44-923F-220D7A11E65C@neville-neil.com> <1331452568.2105.7.camel@nsl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mar 11, 2012, at 03:56 , Kevin Lo wrote:

> George Neville-Neil wrote:
>> On Mar 9, 2012, at 13:44 , Mark Felder wrote:
>>=20
>>> The true test for me is "can you run mp3fs without causing kernel =
panics now?" as I'm told that's why it's not in ports anymore.
>>=20
>> At the moment I'm only using the FUSE example, but I have run =
glusterfs on it, and also sshfs.
>=20
> There's a known problem about exporting fuse file system export=20
> over nfs. I'm wondering if your patch will fix that.
>=20

I have not tried this.  I'll put it on my list of things to check.

Best,
George





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0C9EC90B-8846-4C19-A744-F1ABEFB180D6>