From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul  1 17:43:17 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B41916A41C
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Jul 2005 17:43:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from rbgarga@gmail.com)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5140743D1F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Jul 2005 17:43:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from rbgarga@gmail.com)
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i21so346450wra
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=E3gECSbNc5Iy1N282xPRjP1aCegIhB/BD5s2Pfx9/uyQzZtNEhrTIAOumxWD/WnUKRXUpKeRrYVFLBDDewYSKJ0M+oduzAuqL30z6BgC+jZUZPAbJB3mJZCvMfp3ZNQkacvyv8vw+CISMPPFiVwCa+38QQTL/hTVfdDi0PV4ewE=
Received: by 10.54.77.15 with SMTP id z15mr283872wra;
	Fri, 01 Jul 2005 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.83.7 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <747dc8f305070110432c3995f6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 14:43:15 -0300
From: Renato Botelho <rbgarga@gmail.com>
To: Steve Clement <steve@ion.lu>
In-Reply-To: <42C57263.8020307@ion.lu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <42C57263.8020307@ion.lu>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, dinoex@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Ports: webalizer/geolizer
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Renato Botelho <rbgarga@gmail.com>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:43:17 -0000

On 01/07/05, Steve Clement <steve@ion.lu> wrote:
> Is there any good reason having 2 different ports for these very similar
> ports?
>=20
> I have 1Patch to commit and that would mean twice the work. (Apart from
> that the japanese addition from the "main" webalizer port aren't in
> geolizer...)
>=20
> WEBALIZER_GEOLIZER=3Dyes make install
>=20
> would't that be the solution?
> also Geolizer is unmaintained and webalizer isn't.

You can analyze, and, it it's possible, transfer geolizer to webalizer
port and send a PR asking to delete geolizer.

Regards
--=20
Renato Botelho
ICQ: 54596223
AIM: RBGargaBR