From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 17:38:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3547716A4CE for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:38:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.crypta.net (mail.crypta.net [83.136.131.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E6C43D55 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:38:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ah@crypta.net) Received: by mail.crypta.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B0FE7ECD43B; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:38:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 19:38:20 +0200 From: Andy Hilker To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041018173820.GB56576@mail.crypta.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-PGP-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEC6E1071 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9B2E 5892 AD93 D5C5 FB8E 3912 35D6 951B EC6E 1071 Subject: 5.3-RC1: jail + bind9, devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_RAPPLY: Inappropriate ioctl for device X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:38:24 -0000 Hi, i have upgraded from 5.2.1 to 5.3-RC1. Bind8 runs fine in jail environment. I have migrated as described in /usr/src/UPDATING. Bind9 runs fine, too. But i when jail starts with "named_enable="YES"" in /etc/rc.conf, i see: [...] Starting syslogd. mount_devfs: Operation not permitted devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_RAPPLY: Inappropriate ioctl for device devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_RAPPLY: Inappropriate ioctl for device devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_RAPPLY: Inappropriate ioctl for device Starting named. Clearing /tmp. [...] at startup. With "named_enable="NO"" there are no devfs rule: ioctl... messages. Bind 9 runs, logfiles looks good and i have no devfs rules, but maybe errors on jail startup pointing to another problem. Anyone knows what happens here? bye, Andy