From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jul 2 14:20:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFB437C5FA for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 14:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from volatile.chemikals.org (cae88-49-048.sc.rr.com [24.88.49.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC25E44D3C for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 13:34:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Received: from chemikals.org (www@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by volatile.chemikals.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g62KYm7B025451; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:34:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) From: Wesley Morgan Received: from 148.175.49.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user morganw) by www.chemikals.org with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:34:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <51653.148.175.49.1.1025642090.squirrel@www.chemikals.org> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:34:50 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: KSE status report To: In-Reply-To: References: <13302.148.175.49.1.1025639460.squirrel@www.chemikals.org> X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Cc: , , X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG KDE is working fine. GIMP & GNUCash are the only two "gnome" apps I am using, and they both work. "Everybuddy" now works... In short, it all seems to work. I am using rev 1.225 of proc.h and 1.48 of queue.h. Last cvsup was Jul 1 17:13 MDT. > ok, so you are saying that GNOME stuff works fine? > What do yuo have running and is there still anything that does the > wrong thing? > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Wesley Morgan wrote: > >> After reading this... I got to thinking, and I copied the old headers >> into the wrong place. After rebuilding, it works fine :)... That's >> what I get for doing it at 2am! My fault, you guys could have fixed >> this almost immediately except for some bad info from me. >> > Good idea. >> > >> > Unforunatly someone tried to complie a libc_r with the old queue.h >> > and it had the same problem (or so they said). >> > >> > On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Ian Dowse wrote: >> > >> >> In message >> >> , >> >> Ju lian Elischer writes: >> >> >The big problem at the moment is that something in the >> >> >source tree as a whole, and probably something that came in with >> >> >KSE is stopping us from successfully compiling a working libc_r. >> >> >(a bit ironic really). >> >> >> >> Is the new >> >> >> >> (elm)->field.tqe_next = (void *)-1; >> >> >> >> in TAILQ_REMOVE a likely candidate? That could easily tickle old >> >> bugs in other code. The libc_r code does use a lot of TAILQ macros. >> >> >> >> Ian >> >> >> > >> > >> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message >> >> >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message