Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:57:29 -0800 (PST)
From:      mjacob@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Subject:   CAM_NEW_TRAN changes-next set of changes ready for review
Message-ID:  <20061031115204.Y21918@ns1.feral.com>
In-Reply-To: <7579f7fb0610300801x4650cb3fgb93f662fbf7b4213@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <7579f7fb0610281854l3ec600d7kf0a2cdf20fdcb838@mail.gmail.com>  <7579f7fb0610282210p59de2123g379f0d4069bd1e42@mail.gmail.com>  <45443C7F.5040508@samsco.org> <7579f7fb0610300801x4650cb3fgb93f662fbf7b4213@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

http://people.freebsd.org/~mjacob/DIFFS.CAM_NEW_TRAN_CODE

This is the complete set of changes that remove the non-NEW_TRAN code 
from the kernel and also does the minimal fixes to camlib and camcontrol 
to accomodate the changes (it's just not practical to support old/new 
simultaneously).

I did a somewhat halfhearted run through /usr/ports trying to find 
Makefile and patches that depended on CAM. That turned out to be a 
fairly short list:

  /usr/ports/audio/cdparanoia
  /usr/ports/audio/sound-juicer
  /usr/ports/audio/xmcd
  /usr/ports/emulators/mtools
  /usr/ports/misc/mtx
  /usr/ports/multimedia/k9copy

I *think* based upon scanning them that only cdparanoia would have to 
*really* be recompiled- in fact, it just an XPT_PATH_INQ, so it might 
even get away from having to be recompiled.

Any glaring omissions?

-matt









Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061031115204.Y21918>