Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 15:26:25 -0700 From: "Kian Mohageri" <kian.mohageri@gmail.com> To: "Daniel Eriksson" <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf buggy on 6.1-STABLE? Message-ID: <fee88ee40606081526m46a6a373kc4f138db17205f2b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A605F5BA@royal64.emp.zapto.org> References: <fee88ee40606080706u1adc618eo2c8ed889e7e3199f@mail.gmail.com> <4F9C9299A10AE74E89EA580D14AA10A605F5BA@royal64.emp.zapto.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm aware. I meant that as "pass quick" (without any keep state) ;) Kian On 6/8/06, Daniel Eriksson <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com> wrote: > > Kian Mohageri wrote: > > > 'pass quick' (non-stateful) fixed the problems but I wasn't > > satisfied with that for obvious reasons. > > The 'quick' keyword does not make the rule non-stateful, it only aborts > further evaluation of the specific packet. > > See http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/filter.html#quick for more > information. > > /Daniel Eriksson >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fee88ee40606081526m46a6a373kc4f138db17205f2b>