From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun May 28 23:44:43 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA18859 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 28 May 1995 23:44:43 -0700 Received: from ns.dknet.dk (root@ns.dknet.dk [193.88.44.42]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id XAA18850 for ; Sun, 28 May 1995 23:44:36 -0700 Received: from login.dknet.dk by ns.dknet.dk with SMTP id AA15395 (5.65c8/IDA-1.4.4j for ); Mon, 29 May 1995 08:44:31 +0200 Received: by login.dknet.dk (4.1/SMI-4.1DKnet00) id AA10783; Mon, 29 May 95 08:42:26 +0200 Message-Id: <9505290642.AA10783@login.dknet.dk> Subject: Re: SYSV Shared Mem supported/work ? To: henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu (Charles Henrich) Date: Mon, 29 May 95 8:42:25 MET DST Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199505290230.TAA12220@freefall.cdrom.com>; from "Charles Henrich" at May 28, 95 10:30 pm From: sos@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: sos@FreeBSD.org X-Charset: ASCII X-Char-Esc: 29 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Charles Henrich who wrote: > > I seem to recall some discussion a couple weeks ago that SYSVSHM isnt > support/doesnt work. Is this true or am I hallucinating? (The reason I ask is > the new linux lkm requires it.. :) It works (kind of) for the Linux stuff, but it has many "features" not found in the "real" shm stuff. I'm going to look at it sometime soon... -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Soren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org | sos@login.dknet.dk) FreeBSD Core Team So much code to hack -- so little time