Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:39:59 +0100
From:      Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, "Joseph a Nagy, Jr" <jnagyjr1978@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: tk85 Port Maintenance
Message-ID:  <20121031153958.GE90275@gahrfit.gahr.ch>
In-Reply-To: <CADLo83_VSLt5t31bJbu3-UCuGkNuNnnBEbMXWVd2fhvVwryP5g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <509121B3.3040307@gmail.com> <20121031135749.GC90275@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <50913253.3060700@gmail.com> <20121031152109.GD90275@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <CADLo83_VSLt5t31bJbu3-UCuGkNuNnnBEbMXWVd2fhvVwryP5g@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--ULyIDA2m8JTe+TiX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2012-Oct-31, 15:25, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 31 Oct 2012 15:21, "Pietro Cerutti" <gahr@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2012-Oct-31, 09:14, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote:
> > > On 10/31/12 08:57, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> > > > On 2012-Oct-31, 08:03, Joseph a Nagy Jr wrote:
> > > >> Hi All,
> > > >>
> > > >> I'd like to volunteer to maintain the tk85 port. I've already begun
> > > >> making updates to the Makefile[0] in a workbench directory and hav=
e a
> > > >> working update to it. All changes were due to feedback from portli=
nt.
> > > >> Any and all feedback would be appreciated.
> > > >>
> > > >> [0]: http://pastebin.com/6DuzdAzv
> > > >
> > > > Ehm, your diff fails to apply here..
> > > >
> > >
> > > What's the issue?
> >
> > > patch < tk85.diff
> > Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
> > The text leading up to this was:
> > --------------------------
> > |--- Makefile.orig       2012-10-26 19:47:37.000000000 -0500
> > |+++ Makefile       2012-10-29 20:16:13.000000000 -0500
> > --------------------------
> > Patching file Makefile using Plan A...
> > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y]
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 2.
> > Hunk #2 failed at 12.
> > Hunk #3 failed at 42.
> > Hunk #4 failed at 61.
> > Hunk #5 failed at 423.
> > 4 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.rej
> > done
> >
>=20
> Say no to -r detected; it's noticed the maintainer change.

> patch < tk85.diff
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- Makefile.orig       2012-10-26 19:47:37.000000000 -0500
|+++ Makefile       2012-10-29 20:16:13.000000000 -0500
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y] n
Apply anyway? [n] y
Hunk #1 failed at 1.
Hunk #2 failed at 7.
Hunk #3 failed at 40.
Hunk #4 failed at 58.
Hunk #5 failed at 420.
5 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.rej
done

--=20
Pietro Cerutti
The FreeBSD Project
gahr@FreeBSD.org

PGP Public Key:
http://gahr.ch/pgp

--ULyIDA2m8JTe+TiX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlCRRk4ACgkQwMJqmJVx94659wCfcDZ0M8p5Oa5p4MSdsVB85Exb
3b0AoIDHMRll5c8HATQS1luQjeqy6VHK
=bTcI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ULyIDA2m8JTe+TiX--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121031153958.GE90275>