Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 21:35:42 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster? Message-ID: <20170930193542.GH86601@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <CAN6yY1ukz_gn3Ny4J52qoq0KjGmvDxLEZrBenXPA7o-YC%2BHSyg@mail.gmail.com> References: <81D84A650858BA40BF6936408052E6BC0138263988@msgdb11.utad.utoledo.edu> <k20i-pniy-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20170929182305.GE86601@home.opsec.eu> <20170929183448.GA175@gmail.com> <77334fc4-b64e-45ed-a443-4076e47acee3@BY2NAM03FT029.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com> <BN6PR2001MB173012B1DBBC7BB0A900DAA2807E0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <COL004-MC4F55p68V8z000ac00b@COL004-MC4F55.hotmail.com> <BN6PR2001MB17309E4F64000C0C00DA086D807F0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <CAN6yY1ukz_gn3Ny4J52qoq0KjGmvDxLEZrBenXPA7o-YC%2BHSyg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > "small" systems where the weight poudriere simply can't be justified. (I > have no system with other than SATA disk drives and, for my current needs, > 1 TB of SATA on my development system and .5TB on my production system is > adequate. Both systems are physically constrained in expansion capability, > though otherwise easily meet my requirements. My poudriere builder has 10 jails 103 10.3-RELEASE amd64 10i 10.3-RELEASE-p17 i386 11a 11.0-RELEASE-p1 amd64 11i 11.0-RELEASE-p1 i386 111 11.1-RELEASE amd64 cur 12.0-CURRENT 1200035 arm6 12.0-CURRENT r306902 p64 12.0-CURRENT r306902 93a 9.3-RELEASE-p48 amd64 93i 9.3-RELEASE-p48 i386 and it uses up approx. 3 GB of disk space. The ports distfiles are using up approx. 16 GB of disk space. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170930193542.GH86601>